Mocking in Python
Introduction
Mocking resources when writing tests in Python can be confusing if you’re unfamiliar with doing such things. In this post I am going to cover various aspects of mocking code, which will hopefully be a useful resource for those who are a bit stuck.
Note: in the code examples I’m using pytest, but for the most part that shouldn’t matter.
unittest.mock or mock
In order to ‘mock’ a resource we’ll first need the mock
module, and this is our first stumbling block: which version do we need? i.e. there’s two and they both look to be official (mock
and unittest.mock
).
The mock
module is a backwards compatible library you can download from PyPy, where as unittest.mock
is the same thing but only compatible with the version of Python you’re using.
So in almost all cases you’ll want to import it like so:
import unittest.mock as mock
For more examples, see this reference guide
Decorator
The most common way to mock resources is to use a Python decorator around your test function:
@mock.patch("thing")
def test_stuff(mock_thing):
mock_thing.return_value = 123
In this case, what we’re patching (thing
) can be a variable or a function.
When you do this you’ll need to pass an argument to your function (you can name it whatever you want †) which will be a MagicMock
.
This means if you don’t do anything else, then calls to thing
will (in the example above at least) result in the value 123
being returned.
† convention is to name the variable
mock_<noun>
.
If you’re mocking multiple things then you’ll stack the mock decorators ontop of each other, and pass them along in order to the test function:
@mock.patch("third")
@mock.patch("second")
@mock.patch("first")
def test_stuff(mock_first, mock_second, mock_third):
...
Resource location
It’s important to know that when mocking you should specify the location of the resource to be mocked, relevant to where it’s imported. This is best explained by way of example…
Imagine I have a module app.foo
and within that module I import another dependency like so:
from app.bar import thing
You might think that when you call mock.patch
that you pass it a reference to the resource like app.bar.thing
. That would only be relevant if the resource was being called with that full path within the app.foo
module (e.g. if app.foo
called app.bar.thing(...)
).
If the full namespace path isn’t referenced, which it isn’t in the above example (notice we import just the thing
resource). It means we need to specify the reference namespace to mock as where it’s imported:
@mock.patch('app.foo.thing')
So even though thing
exists within app.bar
we specify app.foo.thing
as app.foo
is where we’ve imported it for use. This catches people out all the time.
Mock return_value vs side_effect
If your function has a try/except around it, then you can use side_effect
to cause the calling of the function to trigger an Exception as the returned value:
@mock.patch('app.aws.sdk.confirm_sign_up', side_effect=Exception('whoops'))
Note: if you had used
return_value=Exception('whoops')
then the mock would return the string representation of the Exception rather than raising an exception likeside_effect
does.
Otherwise if you just need a static value returned, so it’s evaluated at the time it’s defined (not when it’s called), then you can use return_value
instead:
@mock.patch('app.security.secret_hash', return_value='###')
Mock Nested Calls
Calling a property on a mock returns another mock, so in order to mock very specific properties you’ll need to nest your return_value
or side_effect
:
m = mock.MagicMock()
m.return_value.get.side_effect = [1, 2]
m.return_value.post.return_value = 'foo'
x = m()
x.get() # 1
x.post() # foo
x.get() # 2
Things can get a little more confusing when you want to verify a specific nested method on a mocked object was called:
import unittest.mock as mock
from tornado.ioloop import IOLoop
@mock.patch("__main__.IOLoop")
def foo(mock_ioloop):
IOLoop.current()
mock_ioloop.current.assert_called() # will fail if assertion isn't True
IOLoop.current().start()
mock_ioloop.current().start.assert_called() # will fail if assertion isn't True
The reason this can get more complicated is due to how a mock will return a new mock when accessing a property on a mock:
import unittest.mock as mock
from tornado.httpserver import HTTPServer
@mock.patch("__main__.HTTPServer")
def bar(mock_httpserver):
server = HTTPServer()
server.listen(8080)
HTTPServer().listen(123)
mock_httpserver.assert_called()
mock_httpserver().listen.assert_called_with(8080)
The above code will error:
AssertionError: expected call not found.
Expected: listen(8080)
Actual: listen(123)
You’ll need to make sure you assert the mock at the right time:
import unittest.mock as mock
from tornado.httpserver import HTTPServer
@mock.patch("__main__.HTTPServer")
def bar(mock_httpserver):
server = HTTPServer()
mock_httpserver.assert_called()
server.listen(8080)
mock_httpserver().listen.assert_called_with(8080)
HTTPServer().listen(123)
mock_httpserver().listen.assert_called_with(123)
Verify Exceptions
If we want to verify that some piece of code throws an Exception
type when we need it to we can mock specific resources to throw an exception and then use pytest.raises
as a context manager around the caller of our code to be verified.
In the following example our code (in app.account.confirm(...)
) catches a generic Exception
and re-raises it as exceptions.CognitoException
.
We can catch and make assertions against this expected behaviour by first mocking the resource we want to throw an exception and get it to throw our own fake exception using the side_effect
parameter.
Next we specify the exact exception type we’re expecting to be raised using pytest.raises(T)
:
@mock.patch('app.aws.sdk.confirm_sign_up', side_effect=Exception('whoops'))
def test_account_confirm_failure(mock_signup):
with pytest.raises(exceptions.CognitoException) as exc_info:
app.account.confirm(123, 'foo')
assert True is True # this will never be executed!
assert exc_info.typename == 'CognitoException'
assert str(exc_info.value) == 'SIGNUP_CONFIRMATION_FAILED'
Note: don’t make the mistake of putting any assertions within the
with
context manager. Once the Exception is raised by the function being called within thewith
context manager, all code after it inside the block is skipped.
Clearing lru_cache
If a function you wish to test has the functools.lru_cache
decorator applied, then you’ll need to be mindful of mocking the response of that function as it’ll be cached in one test and the cached result will be returned when calling the function again to test some other behaviour (and might likely confuse you when you see the unexpected response).
To fix this issue is very easy because lru_cache
provides additional functions when decoratoring your functions, it provides:
cache_info
cache_clear
The latter (cache_clear
) is what you would need to call. This is demonstrated below:
@lru_cache(5)
def foo():
print('Executing foo...')
foo() # Executing foo...
foo() # <nothing printed as None response was cached and returned>
foo.cache_info() # CacheInfo(hits=1, misses=1, maxsize=5, currsize=1)
foo.cache_clear()
foo() # Executing foo... (notice the 'side effect of print is executed again)
Note: debugging this isn’t always obvious. Later on I demonstrate how to mock the builtin
open
function, and in that scenario I stumbled across this issue, because although I wasn’t mocking the top level function itself (I was mocking the call toopen
within), the contents of the file being opened was what was returned and being cached.
Mock Module Level/Global Variables
With a module variable you can can either set the value directly or use mock.patch
.
In the following example we have the variable client_id
which is a global variable inside the app.aws
module which we import to reference elsewhere in our code:
import app.aws
def test_account_confirm_successful():
app.aws.client_id = 456 # used internally by `confirm()`
...
@mock.patch('app.aws.client_id', 456)
def test_account_confirm_successful():
...
In the mock.patch
example, there are two key things to notice:
- we don’t use
return_value
. - there is no mock instance passed to the test function.
This is because we’re modifying a variable and not a direct function or ‘callable’ so there’s no need to pass a mock into the test function (if you want to change the value a few times within the test itself then you would mock the variable but not immediately assign a value in the decorator).
Mock Instance Method
There are multiple ways to achieve mocking of an instance method. One common approach is to use mock.patch.object
, like so:
from unittest import mock
def test_foo():
with mock.patch.object(FooClass, 'method_of_class', return_value=None) as mock_method:
instance = SomeClass()
instance.method_of_class('arg')
mock_method.assert_called_with('arg')
Another approach is to mock the method like you would a normal function, but you reference the method via the classname:
def test_bar():
r = mock.Mock()
r.content = b'{"success": true}'
with mock.patch('requests.get', return_value=r) as get: # Avoid doing actual GET request
some_function() # internally calls requests.get
get.assert_called_once()
Another (although more heavy handed) approach for mocking a class instance method is to take advantage of the fact that a Mock will return a new mock instance when called:
@mock.patch("foo.bar.SomeClass")
def test_stuff(mock_class):
mock_class.return_value.made_up_function.return_value = "123"
Note: in the above example we mock the entire class, which might not be what you want. If not, then use the previous
mock.patch.object
example instead.
The reason the above example works is because we’re setting return_value
on our mock. Because this is a MagicMock
every attribute referenced returns a new mock instance (a function or property you call on a mock doesn’t have to exist) and so we call made_up_function
on the returned mock, and on that newly created mock we set the final return_value
to 123
.
But as mentioned in the above note, this approach might be a little too blunt depending on what your needs are (whether you care whether you have a some what functioning class or not).
Mock Class Method
To mock a class method is a similar approach to mocking an instance method.
One approach might be that you mock the entire class (but now you have one less return_value
to assign to):
mock_class.ClassMethodName.return_value = "123"
Or better yet you should mock it like you would any normal function, but just reference the method via the class:
@mock.patch('myapp.Foo.class_method_name')
def test_classmethod(self, mock_class_method):
mock_class_method.return_value = "foobar"
Mock Entire Class
To mock an entire class you’ll need to set the return_value
to be a new instance of the class.
@mock.patch('myapp.app.Car')
def test_class(self, mock_car):
class NewCar(object):
def get_make(self):
return 'Audi'
@property
def wheels(self):
return 6
mock_car.return_value = NewCar()
...
See other class related mocking tips here
Mock Async Calls
Mocking asynchronous code is probably the most confusing aspect of mocking. My ‘go to’ solution I’ll explain first, but after that I’ll share some alternative methods I’ve seen and tried in the past.
First consider this asynchronous code inside of a app.foo
module:
import app.stuff
async def do_thing(x):
return await app.stuff.some_concurrent_function(x)
If we need to mock the coroutine app.stuff.some_concurrent_function
, then we can solve this by creating a function that acts as a coroutine and allow it to be configurable for different types of responses:
Note: the example uses tornado for running an asynchronous test.
def make_coroutine(response):
"""You could pass response as a mock or a raw data structure, doesn't matter."""
async def coroutine(*args, **kwargs):
"""*args will be whatever is passed to the original async function.
Meaning you could have a conditional check that let's us change
the response to be anything we need.
"""
return response
return coroutine
class TestThing(tornado.testing.AsyncTestCase):
@mock.patch('app.stuff.some_concurrent_function')
@tornado.testing.gen_test
def test_async_func(self, mock_thing):
mock_thing.side_effect = make_coroutine('some response')
result = yield app.foo.do_thing('xyz')
assert result == 'some response'
If you do include an if
statement within make_coroutine
, you could pass in a MagicMock as a simple way of having a single input give you multiple different values back…
def make_coroutine(response):
async def coroutine(*args, **kwargs):
if args[0] == 'x':
return response.x
elif args[0] == 'y':
return response.y
else:
return response.default
return coroutine
m = mock.MagicMock(x=1, y=2, default=3)
coro = make_coroutine(m)
When dealing with side_effects that need to sometimes trigger an Exception and other times suceed you could use a slightly modified mock implementation that checks if the given response object is callable or not…
count = 0
def make_side_effect_coroutine(side_effect):
"""Side effect friendly mock coroutine.
In some tests we need to have a mocked coroutine return a different value
when it's called multiple times, but a mock side_effect can't trigger a
raised exception when given an iterator, and so we have to construct that
behaviour ourselves.
"""
async def coroutine(*args, **kwargs):
return side_effect(*args, **kwargs) if callable(side_effect) else side_effect
return coroutine
@mock.patch('app.thing')
def test_confirm_email_change_failure(self, mock_thing):
def side_effects(*args, **kwargs):
"""Use global var to control mock side effects."""
global count
if count > 0:
raise Exception('whoops')
count += 1
return # don't raise an exception the first time around
mock_thing.side_effect = make_side_effect_coroutine(side_effects)
If the above approach doesn’t work for you, here are some alternatives…
AsyncMock
Note: this utilizes the package
pytest-asyncio
to help with testing asyncio code
Let’s start with the code to be mocked…
import asyncio
async def sum(x, y):
await asyncio.sleep(1)
return x + y
Now here’s how we’d mock it…
import pytest
import asyncio
# create a new pytest fixture called mock_sum
#
@pytest.fixture()
def mock_sum(mocker):
async_mock = AsyncMock()
mocker.patch('app.sum', side_effect=async_mock)
return async_mock
# Python <3.8 would have used
#
# future = asyncio.Future()
# mocker.patch('app.sum', return_value=future)
# return future
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_sum(mock_sum):
mock_sum.return_value = 4
# Python <3.8 would have used
#
# mock_sum.set_result(4)
result = await sum(1, 2)
assert result == 4
Monkey Patch
# allow mock to be used as an await expression...
async def async_response():
return namedtuple('_', ['body'])('{"state": "success"}')
def mock_async_expression(our_mock):
return async_response().__await__()
mock.MagicMock.__await__ = mock_async_expression
MagicMock Subclass
class AsyncMock(MagicMock):
async def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs):
return super(AsyncMock, self).__call__(*args, **kwargs)
class TestHandlers(testing.AsyncTestCase):
@mock.patch('app.handlers.trigger_soft_cdn_purge', new_callable=AsyncMock)
@mock.patch('app.handlers.api')
@testing.gen_test
async def test_update_cache(self, api_mock, trigger_soft_cdn_purge):
response = mock.MagicMock()
response.code = 200
api_mock.buzz = AsyncMock(return_value=response)
Async Inline Function
@mock.patch('app.buzz_api.api_gateway')
@testing.gen_test
async def test_buzz_api(self, client_mock):
async def get(url, **kwargs):
return
client_mock.get.side_effect = get
Mock Instance Types
When mocking an object you’ll find that the mock replaces the entire object and so it can cause tests to pass (or fail) in unexpected ways.
Meaning, if you need to make a mock more like the concrete interface, then there are two ways to do that:
spec
wrap
We can use mock’s spec
feature to mimic all methods/attributes of the object being mocked. This ensures your mocks have the same api as the objects they are replacing.
Note: there is a stricter
spec_set
that will raise anAttributeError
.
This is best demonstrated with an example:
import unittest.mock as mock
import tornado.simple_httpclient
from tornado.httpclient import AsyncHTTPClient
http_client = AsyncHTTPClient()
type(http_client) # tornado.simple_httpclient.SimpleAsyncHTTPClient
isinstance(http_client, tornado.simple_httpclient.SimpleAsyncHTTPClient) # True
isinstance(mock.MagicMock(), tornado.simple_httpclient.SimpleAsyncHTTPClient) # False
m = mock.MagicMock(spec=tornado.simple_httpclient.SimpleAsyncHTTPClient)
isinstance(m, tornado.simple_httpclient.SimpleAsyncHTTPClient) # True
The wrap
parameter on the other hand allows you to ‘spy’ on the implementation, as well as affect its behaviour. In the following example I want to spy on the builtin datetime
implementation:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("input_date, input_url, valid", [
("2017-06-17T00:00:00.000000Z", "foo", True),
("2017-06-18T00:00:00.000000Z", "bar", False),
])
@mock.patch("app.handlers.data.datetime", wraps=datetime)
def test_valid_video(mock_datetime, input_date, input_url, valid):
mock_datetime.now.return_value = datetime(2017, 6, 18, 00, 00, 00, 000000)
assert valid_video(input_date, input_url) is valid
Another way to use wrap
is like so:
from unittest import mock
class Foo(object):
def bar(self, x, y):
return x + y + 1
def test_bar():
foo = Foo()
with mock.patch.object(foo, 'bar', wraps=foo.bar) as wrapped_foo:
foo.bar(1, 3)
wrapped_foo.assert_called_with(1, 2)
test_bar()
Another simplified version of the above that mocks the whole object, not just a single method:
from unittest import mock
class Foo():
def bar(self, msg):
print(msg)
f = Foo()
spy = mock.MagicMock(wraps=f)
spy.bar('baz')
spy.bar.assert_called_with('beep') # raises AssertionError
Mock builtin open
function
Python’s mock library provides an abstraction for mocking the builtin open
function a lot simpler…
def test_load_ui_messages_successful():
"""Verify ui message YAML file can be read properly."""
file_content = 'foo: bar'
with mock.patch('bf_auth.utility.open', mock.mock_open(read_data=file_content), create=True) as mock_builtin_open:
assert utils.load_ui_messages('./path/to/non/existing/file.yaml') == {'foo': 'bar'}
The create=True
param set on mock.patch
means that the mock.MagicMock
returned will automagically create any attributes that are called on the mock (this is because the open
function will attempt to access lots of different things and it’s easier for mock to mock out all of that for you).
Conclusion
There we’ll end. Hopefully this list of mocking techniques will be able to see you through even the most complex of code needing to be tested. Let me know what you think on twitter.